Ask the Readers: A History Conundrum
By Tamahome Jenkins · August 16, 2009Yesterday, at the end of the post, I asked readers to find one event that happened on that day, and post it in the comments. One of them, the only one that posted actually, came across an interesting problem. My friend Julie writes:
I’ve been enjoying your blog, and wanted to find an event that happened today (that hadn’t been posted by EiH yet;)). Researching took me down something of a rabbit hole, however. I discovered an interesting fact: August 15 (1865) is considered the day Sir Joseph Lister “discovered” the antiseptic process for surgery, and reduced post-surgical mortality from 50% to 15%. Pretty darn important! (In fact the mouthwash Listerine and the bacteria Listeria are named for him). However, what does it mean to “discover” such a process on a particular day? I couldn’t find an answer. Rather, Lister underwent his first antiseptic surgery procedure on Aug. 12 of that year (using carbolic acid to sterilize wounds, hands and instruments).
So I questioned August 15th, and looked to the source of that date and information. I was continually led back to “The Associated Press.” Interesting.
Maybe there really IS some correlation to today’s date and the “discovery” of antiseptic surgery. But what if there isn’t? What if the guy or gal writing today’s factoids for the AP, about to be published in newspapers around the world, was a few days off? What if THEIR source was a few days off? And furthermore…..does it even matter?
Julie brings up some very valid points. One thing to consider when dealing with the invention/discovery of processes, is that others have probably used the process, but the person we know is the one that gets the credit. Lister could have watched a farmer disinfecting in order to save his animals, which would then save him money, then Lister ran with it and used it on people. Maybe Lister *discovered* his process on the 15th because his patient actually survived for three days. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter, because the important part is that surgical mortality dropped, and has led to the technological advances that we have today. I personally enjoy on this day factoids because it shows us how far we’ve come. But that’s just my opinion. Tell us in the comments, what do you think? Do you care?
You may also like:
- This Day in Geek History This isn’t just another rehashing of the generally unremarkable...
- A Short History of the Federal Income Tax Since today is Tax Day, I thought I'd give you...
- On This Day in History: Friday the 13th Today is the first Friday the 13th of 2009! The...
- On This Day in History: Happy 200th Birthday, Charles Darwin! For today's headline, EverythingIsHistory.com will focus on Charles Darwin, the...








I have to agree with the author of EiH: on-this-day factoids are the shortest, sweetest way to gain some historical perspective. Sometimes they open the door for further exploration (like the Lister fact above). “August 15″ isn’t really important in this case; the concept/event listed after it is. But my research lead to some thinking which can be summed up in a quote tweeted by EiH yesterday:
“Perhaps nobody has changed the course of history as much as the historians. ~Franklin P. Jones”
Doesn’t have to be a historian. For better or for worse, if the Associated Press or any other body of information distribution says that Lister discovered the process of antiseptic surgery on August 15 1865, well…. then he did.